Cost per lead is the wrong number for law firm marketing
Firms that buy on cost per lead optimize for volume. The number that decides profit is cost per signed case.
Industry
Claimant acquisition and intake for mass tort and class action dockets.
Mass tort work turns on qualifying criteria: product or exposure, injury, dates, and jurisdiction. Ironstark builds campaigns and intake around those criteria, with screening questions written with the firm's attorneys.
Campaigns are paced to the firm's case acceptance and docket timelines. Reporting tracks signed claimants and cost per signed claimant by source, along with document completion rates.
Constraints
Programs are designed around these from the first brief. Requirements change, so each client confirms what applies with its own counsel.
Process
Product or exposure, injury, dates, and jurisdiction become screening questions.
Campaign volume follows the firm's case acceptance and docket timelines.
Intake collects documents and records needed for each claimant file.
Measurement
Cost per signed claimant
Qualification rate by source
Document completion rate
Time from contact to signed claimant
Capabilities
Owned sites and funnels that produce first-party leads with documented source and consent.
Our own U.S. call center, staffed in-house, running on call center technology we built.
SMS, email, and voice sequences that keep contacts moving between human touches.
Consent capture, ad review records, and contact rules built into daily operations.
FAQ
Yes. Screening questions and targeting are updated when the firm changes its criteria.
Under the firm's instructions and the privacy rules that apply, with access limited to the people who need it.
Firms that buy on cost per lead optimize for volume. The number that decides profit is cost per signed case.
Legal intake works best when the firm's attorneys write the qualifying questions and the intake team applies them the same way every time.